LEARN · MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION
Mathematical induction: from the principle to a complete proof
The induction principle and one complete example for the sum of the first positive integers; not all of section 5.2.
From one case to a general statement
Checking a few values can suggest a pattern, but does not by itself prove it for every integer. Mathematical induction gives a proof: we establish a starting case and show why the truth of any admissible case implies the truth of the next.
In this lesson we state the induction principle and give a complete proof of the formula for the sum of the first positive integers. This is one complete example from the induction topic; the other examples in the section are outside this lesson.
What P(n) means
denotes a statement about an integer . Substituting a particular admissible integer gives a statement that can be true or false. The letter names the statement; it is not an extra factor.
Let be a fixed integer that marks the starting index. We want to establish for every integer . In the step we use a different letter, , for an arbitrary integer ; it does not stand for a preselected numerical value.
Principle of mathematical induction
Let be a statement defined for integers , and let be a fixed integer. If both conditions below hold, then is true for every integer .
Base case: is true.
Inductive step: for every integer , if is true, then is also true.
Both conditions are needed. The base supplies a starting point, and the general step reaches each successive case. A step without a starting point is not enough; checking several starting values without a general step is not enough either.
Here the principle is used as the foundation of the proof method. A formal derivation from other properties of the integers is outside this lesson.
Basis: What P(n) means
denotes a statement about an integer . Substituting a particular admissible integer gives a statement that can be true or false. The letter names the statement; it is not an extra factor.
Let be a fixed integer that marks the starting index. We want to establish for every integer . In the step we use a different letter, , for an arbitrary integer ; it does not stand for a preselected numerical value.
What the step allows us to assume
To prove the step, take an arbitrary integer and temporarily assume . This is the induction hypothesis. Under that assumption we must derive .
We do not assume the statement for all indices at once, and we do not assume , which remains to be proved. We may write the next-case formula as a target, but may not use it as an established equality.
This is not circular reasoning: within the step we prove the conditional statement . A true base case and a proved general step together establish the result unconditionally for all admissible indices.
Basis: Principle of mathematical induction
Let be a statement defined for integers , and let be a fixed integer. If both conditions below hold, then is true for every integer .
Base case: is true.
Inductive step: for every integer , if is true, then is also true.
Both conditions are needed. The base supplies a starting point, and the general step reaches each successive case. A step without a starting point is not enough; checking several starting values without a general step is not enough either.
Here the principle is used as the foundation of the proof method. A formal derivation from other properties of the integers is outside this lesson.
Separating the last term of a sum
In the notation below, is the summation index. For an integer , it runs through the values from to , including each once.
For , the sum contains only . For an integer , moving from the sum through to the sum through adds exactly one new term:
The parentheses contain the old sum. This is the part that the induction hypothesis can replace when it gives the value of that sum. The new term is outside that replacement.
Sum of the first n positive integers
For every integer ,
We will prove this by induction. The complete proof follows below; references to supporting facts only clarify steps that are already explained.
1. The statement and starting index
Let denote the following equality:
The terms being added are the indices themselves: . The required range starts at , so we use in the induction principle.
Basis: What P(n) means
denotes a statement about an integer . Substituting a particular admissible integer gives a statement that can be true or false. The letter names the statement; it is not an extra factor.
Let be a fixed integer that marks the starting index. We want to establish for every integer . In the step we use a different letter, , for an arbitrary integer ; it does not stand for a preselected numerical value.
Basis: Separating the last term of a sum
In the notation below, is the summation index. For an integer , it runs through the values from to , including each once.
For , the sum contains only . For an integer , moving from the sum through to the sum through adds exactly one new term:
The parentheses contain the old sum. This is the part that the induction hypothesis can replace when it gives the value of that sum. The new term is outside that replacement.
2. Base case: n = 1
For , the left-hand side has just one term, . The right-hand side is also :
The two sides agree, so is true. The base case has been proved independently of the induction hypothesis.
Basis: Separating the last term of a sum
In the notation below, is the summation index. For an integer , it runs through the values from to , including each once.
For , the sum contains only . For an integer , moving from the sum through to the sum through adds exactly one new term:
The parentheses contain the old sum. This is the part that the induction hypothesis can replace when it gives the value of that sum. The new term is outside that replacement.
Basis: Principle of mathematical induction
Let be a statement defined for integers , and let be a fixed integer. If both conditions below hold, then is true for every integer .
Base case: is true.
Inductive step: for every integer , if is true, then is also true.
Both conditions are needed. The base supplies a starting point, and the general step reaches each successive case. A step without a starting point is not enough; checking several starting values without a general step is not enough either.
Here the principle is used as the foundation of the proof method. A formal derivation from other properties of the integers is outside this lesson.
3. Hypothesis for an arbitrary k
Let be an arbitrary integer. Assume that is true, that is,
This hypothesis concerns exactly the first terms. We must now obtain the formula for the first terms.
Basis: What the step allows us to assume
To prove the step, take an arbitrary integer and temporarily assume . This is the induction hypothesis. Under that assumption we must derive .
We do not assume the statement for all indices at once, and we do not assume , which remains to be proved. We may write the next-case formula as a target, but may not use it as an established equality.
This is not circular reasoning: within the step we prove the conditional statement . A true base case and a proved general step together establish the result unconditionally for all admissible indices.
4. The next-case target
Substitute for every in the original formula. The right-hand side becomes , or . Our target is therefore:
This states the target; it is not a new assumption. We will start by transforming its left-hand side.
Basis: What the step allows us to assume
To prove the step, take an arbitrary integer and temporarily assume . This is the induction hypothesis. Under that assumption we must derive .
We do not assume the statement for all indices at once, and we do not assume , which remains to be proved. We may write the next-case formula as a target, but may not use it as an established equality.
This is not circular reasoning: within the step we prove the conditional statement . A true base case and a proved general step together establish the result unconditionally for all admissible indices.
5. Separate the new term
The sum through contains all the old terms from through , followed by the new last term . We have only regrouped the same finite sum; we have not used the next-case formula.
Basis: Separating the last term of a sum
In the notation below, is the summation index. For an integer , it runs through the values from to , including each once.
For , the sum contains only . For an integer , moving from the sum through to the sum through adds exactly one new term:
The parentheses contain the old sum. This is the part that the induction hypothesis can replace when it gives the value of that sum. The new term is outside that replacement.
6. Apply the hypothesis only to the old sum
By , the parenthesized expression equals . Equal quantities may replace one another within a sum. The new term remains unchanged; we do not replace the entire sum through by the formula we are still proving.
Basis: What the step allows us to assume
To prove the step, take an arbitrary integer and temporarily assume . This is the induction hypothesis. Under that assumption we must derive .
We do not assume the statement for all indices at once, and we do not assume , which remains to be proved. We may write the next-case formula as a target, but may not use it as an established equality.
This is not circular reasoning: within the step we prove the conditional statement . A true base case and a proved general step together establish the result unconditionally for all admissible indices.
Basis: Hypothesis for an arbitrary k
Let be an arbitrary integer. Assume that is true, that is,
This hypothesis concerns exactly the first terms. We must now obtain the formula for the first terms.
7. Use a common denominator
Write the second term with denominator . Multiplication by does not change its value:
Expand both numerators using the distributive law:
The denominators agree, so add the numerators and combine like terms: . This gives:
8. Compare with the target right-hand side
The target contains . Expand its numerator:
We transformed the left-hand side into ; the right-hand side equals the same quantity. Hence the two sides are equal, and follows under the hypothesis . This completes the step.
Basis: The next-case target
Substitute for every in the original formula. The right-hand side becomes , or . Our target is therefore:
This states the target; it is not a new assumption. We will start by transforming its left-hand side.
9. Conclusion by induction
We proved . For an arbitrary integer , we also derived from , without assigning a special value to . Both conditions of the induction principle hold, so
The hypothesis was used within the proof of the step. The final formula is established for every integer in the stated range, with no additional assumption.
Basis: Principle of mathematical induction
Let be a statement defined for integers , and let be a fixed integer. If both conditions below hold, then is true for every integer .
Base case: is true.
Inductive step: for every integer , if is true, then is also true.
Both conditions are needed. The base supplies a starting point, and the general step reaches each successive case. A step without a starting point is not enough; checking several starting values without a general step is not enough either.
Here the principle is used as the foundation of the proof method. A formal derivation from other properties of the integers is outside this lesson.
Apply the method to another sum
The linked practice asks you either to order a proof for a different sum or to identify exactly what the hypothesis allows you to replace. Try it first. If you need a supporting fact, revisit the induction principle and the rule for separating the last term; the full exercise solution is opened by a separate action.
Proof for a sum of even integers
The same induction structure with a different new term; checks transfer of the method and dependencies between steps.
Open exercise →Scope of the induction hypothesis
Checks the distinction between the hypothesis for the old sum and the next-case target without repeating the worked example.
Open exercise →